Authority is the institution's Practitioner-level infrastructure add-on to a Foundation engagement. Where Foundation builds the subject's institutional authority, Authority builds the practitioner-level layer — credentialed authorship, professional body surfacing, individual practitioner profiles — for each named practitioner the subject employs.
Authority sits inside Foundation. It is the work that makes each named practitioner — partner, principal, senior associate — individually visible to AI systems, with their credentials, memberships, and contributions made machine-readable.
AI systems do not recommend organisations as readily as they recommend practitioners. Subjects whose individual practitioners are invisible to AI are institutionally visible but practitioner-blind — and the buyer's question is increasingly framed at the practitioner level. Authority is the work that closes that asymmetry.
Authority delivers a structured architecture for each named practitioner the subject elects to enrol. The work is sized per practitioner and reviewed annually.
Authority is not appropriate for every subject. The institution recommends it where one or more of the following is true.
Subjects with three or more named practitioners — partners, principals, senior associates — whose individual visibility materially affects pipeline.
Subjects whose value proposition is the named specialist (e.g. recognised expert witness, sub-specialty practitioner, named principal craftsman).
Legal, financial advice, allied health, and other regulated industries where AI systems weight individual credentialing heavily.
Subjects whose locations are led by named principals whose authority drives local-region AI surfacing.
Authority is purchased alongside Foundation. The Audit identifies whether it is indicated.
Begin an Audit →